Hallo Fernando, Some additional notes: (Disclaimer: I'm not a DD/DM; also I am quite new to reviewing...)
* avt seems to me not as a best-practice name: it is very short (and might cause name collisions later), does not give a glue about the package. How's about aviation-tools * As said already, please check your package with a recent version of lintian. I won't repeat here what lintian tells. But it will be very hard to find a sponsor with lintian problems present and good explanations absent. *d/compat: why not 9? *d/control: your B-D on debhelper needs not version >8.0.0, >8 is sufficient. (or >9, when you change d/compat) * d/control: short description should be reworked, see policy ยง3.4, same for the extended description: "The description field needs to make sense to anyone, even people who have no idea about any of the things the package deals with." (From the policy) *d/copyright is missing. Lintian told that already, but when you create it, use the dep5 format. (https://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat) regards, coldtobi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
