Hi Christophe, please, don't get me wrong. I do really appreciate your work on the package and I will be glad to sponsor it further, if you need that.
I just wanted to notice, that both of these packages should really be updated. If somebody will need to NMU one of them, it can be really difficult to do it. Slepc_3.4.2 in NEW queue. Cheers, Anton 2013/9/17 trophime <christophe.troph...@lncmi.cnrs.fr>: > > This package, of course, needs some cleanup especially the debian/rules > I agree. However I completely disagree with your latest comment: > * First because PETSC/SLEPC are among the main ingredient of many > scientific libraries which are already in Debian and are of great > interest for performing simulations > * Second this debian/rules is the result of hours spent by many people > (including me) to get this package into Debian and thus provide users > with valuable libraires for either their work or research. I personnaly > believe that we can improve things without being an "integrist". Being > to strict would make people get away from the effort of packaging... > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
