On Thursday 03 November 2005 11:47 am, Yann Dirson wrote:
> This is an amd64 kernel, right ?  I expect that such a kernel would
> not be completely supported, since the upstream says about 2.6.13 support:
>
> "In progress. Trying to incorporate x86_64 support."

Interesting.  I just looked at the kernel config and, actually, this kernel is 
built with CONFIG_MK7=7, so, no, it's not a 64-bit kernel.  I don't remember 
right now, but I guess I must have had the same idea and dropped back to a 
32-bit kernel.

Sorry, it looks like my bug report was incorrect.  The kernel config is 
identical to 2.6.11-1-K7 (except with badram turned on).

> That could explain what you are seeing.  Could you please try to build
> the kernel for an ia32 machine ?

I'm pretty swamped at the moment, but over the next few days I'll try building 
it for straight i386 and see if that works any differently.  I have replaced 
my bad RAM with good stuff, so I've largely lost interest... but I'll follow 
through anyway.  While I'm at it, I'll update to 2.6.14, using the 
linux-source package and the configuration from linux-image-2.6.14-1-386.  
That way it will be easier for you to reproduce.

Thanks,

        Shawn.

Attachment: pgpg9nelRMpMz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to