On September 14, 2013 02:34:12 PM YunQiang Su wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Steve M. Robbins <st...@sumost.ca> wrote:
> > Can you shed some light on why Boost has successfully built > > on mips and mipsel for years with this flaw? > If we have mips64el [...] > For mips64el [...] The original bug report text referenced "mips* systems". However, both your examples are for mips64el. Is the problem confined to mips64el? Thanks, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.