Package: libc0.1-dev Version: 2.17-92 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer,
FreeBSD wiki [0] states that accept4, SOCK_CLOEXEC and SOCK_NONBLOCK are implemented only in FreeBSD 10, but libc on gnu/kfreebsd has prototype for accept4. It seems to me that even if debian's kfreebsd supports accept4 (I doubt) it will be better to remove that prototype because: 1) it's useless without SOCK_CLOEXEC or SOCK_NONBLOCK 2) some software assumes that accept4 and SOCK_CLOEXEC go together so they check only for accept4 but not for SOCK_CLOEXEC, it's the reason why ruby2.0 build is failed on kfreebsd. rmh@ suggested in debian-bsd to wrap accept4 definition: #if defined(SOCK_CLOEXEC) || defined(SOCK_NONBLOCK) /* accept4 prototype */ #endif [0]: https://wiki.freebsd.org/AtomicCloseOnExec -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i386) Kernel: kFreeBSD 9.2-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libc0.1-dev depends on: ii kfreebsd-kernel-headers 9.2~2 ii libc-dev-bin 2.17-92 ii libc0.1 2.17-92 Versions of packages libc0.1-dev recommends: ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.8.1-3 ii gcc-4.6 [c-compiler] 4.6.4-4 ii gcc-4.8 [c-compiler] 4.8.1-10 Versions of packages libc0.1-dev suggests: pn glibc-doc <none> ii manpages-dev 3.53-1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
