"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, Hello, > > I believe that the license is GPLv3, not LGPL-2.1, see: I asked to the CCP4 peoples and they use LGPL-3, for the opensource libraries. (not all CCP4 software are opensource DFSG-free) It is true that licenses has changed durign the time. This is maybe why I did this mistake. I started the work on ssm a long time ago. Sorry about that. > > http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/cvs/viewvc.cgi/ssm/COPYING?revision=1.3&view=markup > > Older revisions of that file shows that it had other awkward licenses > in the past, but not LGPL-2.1 (as far as I can see). my mistake. You can reject ssm then I will prepare a new one with the LGPL-3 version and reupload it. once again sorry. two errors in one week, this is too much... Cheers -- GPG public key 4096R/4696E015 2011-02-14 fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr> GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11 fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <pi...@debian.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
