Package: texlive-fonts-recommended Version: 2012.20120611-5 Severity: minor
Hi, I wonder why the texlive-fonts-recommended package pulls in ttf-marvosym? I mean, sure, there is a symlink in /usr/share/texlive/texmf- dist/fonts/truetype/public/marvosym/marvosym.ttf that would be dangling if this package wasn't installed. But, seriously, I doubt that LaTeX really uses the Truetype variant when the Type 1 variant of that "font" is available in /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/marvosym/marvosym.pfb. - Fabian -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable'), (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages texlive-fonts-recommended depends on: ii dpkg 1.16.10 ii tex-common 4.03 ii texlive-base 2012.20120611-5 ii texlive-common 2012.20120611-5 ii ttf-marvosym 0.1+dfsg-2 Versions of packages texlive-fonts-recommended recommends: pn tex-gyre <none> pn texlive-fonts-recommended-doc <none> ii tipa 2:1.3-19 texlive-fonts-recommended suggests no packages. Versions of packages tex-common depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.50 ii dpkg 1.16.10 ii ucf 3.0027+nmu1 Versions of packages tex-common suggests: ii debhelper 9.20130720 Versions of packages texlive-fonts-recommended is related to: ii tex-common 4.03 ii texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-4 -- debconf information: tex-common/check_texmf_wrong: tex-common/check_texmf_missing: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
