On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> [2013.08.26.2322 +0200]: > > I don't see any valid argument why this list should be private > > without archiving. > > > > Please give me some details which this makes sense. I thought > > debconf is an open project. > > Good question. I think the reason is two-fold: > > 1. Some parents are rather restrictive wrt talking about their > off-spring on the Tubes; > > 2. debconf-kids is going to mainly about exchange and > self-organisation of child care at DebConf. While I think that > we should still strive to provide a basic framework for child > care, volunteers will be required to make it really useful for > parents. And those volunteers are probably going to be parents, > who might have an easier time discussing organisation if they > know that Google won't know about it. > > Does this make sense? No, I am sorry. Especially as a parent interested in the topic this doesn't make sense to me. I want to follow the process, even when I won't participate now. But I want to be able to step in later (when debconf comes back to europe) and I want to read the archives then.
Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
