On Tue Aug 06 13:38, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> Can it simply be "except if it is a .jar file" in parenthesis instead
> of vague "in the sense that it is meant to be uncompressed with..."?

We want to write policy to be general and not have 100s of special exceptions. 
In this case what is special is not that it's a jar file, but that the user 
isn't meant to interact with it using standard compressed file tools. This is 
not a state unique to jar files. Even if there aren't any other known cases 
now, we want to write policy in a way that can apply to them in the futuer.

Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to