Quoting Jeremy Bicha (2013-08-02 18:16:59) > > This issue, while valid, isn't serious. > > I disagree. It's impossible to build sflphone in Debian unstable which > means it's impossible to fix bugs (security or otherwise) in that > package. That makes ucommon in its current form "unsuitable for > release". Because of the soname transition that can't be completed
No, sflphone having FTBFS renders _sflphone_ "unsuitable for release". ucommon has other uses than for sflphone. > (and that wasn't coordinated with the Release Team), it won't be > migrating to testing anyway until this bug is fixed. It is news to me that Release Team must be involved in library changes beyond larger ones and during freeze. Where is that documented? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
