On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> wrote: > (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) > Understood :). Hight appreciate your feedback though.
> Why is .orig.tar different than the one uscan downloads? > Watch file links to github tags / releases but the git repository does not contain final autoconf / automake outputs (configure, Makefile.in etc.) whereas the orig.tar is the output from 'make dist'. Not sure whether this is desirable or not. Any suggestions or recommendations? > The package FTBFS here: > > checking for a Python interpreter with version >= 2.7... none > configure: error: no suitable Python interpreter found > Added missing python2.7-dev build dependency to the debian/control file. > Lintian emits: > > I: bitz-server source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field > "section" in package libbitz-server-mod-py > I: bitz-server source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field > "section" in package libbitz-server-mod-py-modules > I: bitz-server source: duplicate-short-description bitz-server > bitz-server-dev > I: bitz-server source: duplicate-short-description libicap0 libicap0-dev > P: bitz-server source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5 Fixed > > My pet peeve: you build-depend on "debhelper (>= 9.0.0)", but debhelper no > longer uses such a versioning scheme. You probably wanted to say "debhelper > (>= 9)". Changed > > -- > Jakub Wilk > -- Udi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
