[dropping ftpmasters, was an invalid address anyways] Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 31.07.2013, 20:12 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > Quoting Joachim Breitner (2013-07-31 19:03:47) > > Jonas: How would you want your relation to the Haskell Group to be? > > I consider myself a member of the Haskell Group. I believe I am > subscribed to the mailinglist but not - as Phil has now pointed out to > me - member of the Alioth team. Ok, fixed that, if only to avoid confusion. > I see no need for that Alioth membership, as I feel fine using > collab-maint for the packages I am involved with - pandoc and now also > haskell-swish and its dependency haskell-intern. The reason I favor > collab-maint is to make it as easy as possible for other DDs to > contribute. It is my understanding that the Haskell Group is fine with > this, but if not then I am ok moving the package to pkg-haskell (and > then obviously would need to be part of that group to be able to > continue my work on those packages). While I’m fine with Haskell packages having their repository elsewhere, this is under the assumption that the maintainers are willing to apply the mass-changes that we do across all darcs-maintained packages to their packages in a timely manner, which has worked ok so far. OTOH, especially for pure Haskell library packages (e.g. intern) I don’t see the advantage in not having them where all the other packages live. The extra work that maintaining one more package within our usual infrastructure causes is, by now, less than having to remember if and where other packages live. So take this as an invitation to put the new packages to the other Haskell packages, or alternatively just tell us what you want packaged (as we do it with the pandoc dependencies). > As I also told Phil, my interest is in the Swish executable. Similar to > Pandoc I have made separate binary packages for the libraries and the > executable, as I would expect users of the library to be comfortable > with having it provided same way as all other Haskell libraries - please > do correct me if that assumption is wrong. The pandoc program is useful on its own. From reading the Swish websites it seems that it is more of a toolkit where you write „scripts“ in Haskell. If that is the case then the swish executable is not very useful on its own, and should live with or depend on libghc-swish-dev. But I could not find enough information to be sure about this. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
