My mistake, sorry.
Tried it, thought it worked but actually didn't.
Thanks,
Gerardo
2013/7/29 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net>
> On 07/29/2013 12:04 PM, Gerardo Malazdrewicz wrote:
> > If it does, it does it in a cleaner way than the patch there, IMO.
>
> I have no evidence that changing the object/library link ordering at
> build time resolves the recursive LDPRELOAD access (segfault due to
> stack exhaustion) at runtime. You appear to think these are related
> somehow; can you explain in more detail?
>
> --dkg
>
>
