S�bastien Villemot dixit: >I agree with you, but the point is that ATLAS was not designed to >provide a generic binary package. Instead, ATLAS is meant to be
Ah, I see. >answer. My inclination would be to choose a machine that is closest to >the average m68k hardware that people are using nowadays. Ideally it >should not be done on a VM, but on real hardware; but if you don’t have >access to real hardware, then let’s do it on a VM. Okay. We can probably get someone else involved in Debian/m68k to run it on real hardware later. (The problems here are that those machines aren’t necessarily otherwise idle, and for VMs the host in addition is a shared medium… but we can get some sort of initial guess values on the VM and get “real” values on the slower bare- metal ones later… although running it on them should probably involve killing e.g. cron beforehand?) It’s running (slowly) at the moment, and I hope we won’t have to do this for every upload? bye, //mirabilos -- <dileks> ch: good, you corrected yourself. ppl tend to tweet such news immediately, sth. like "grml devs seem to be buyable" <ch> dileks: we _are_. if you throw enough money in our direction, things will happen <mika> everyone is buyable, it's just a matter of price <mrud> and now comes [mira] and uses this as a signature ;0 -- they asked for it… -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
