On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:28:43PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Yup, I already noticed that older LD_ASSUME_KERNEL values > gave results such as the above. However, I was not sure > of the intention of your response? Did you mean that the > proposed text should be changed? If so, could you be more > specific about what changes you'd like.
I'm not sure there's any point in documenting the use of the 2.2.5 version to disable TLS, when that's just obsolete now. The rest seemed fine. (I don't think glibc currently has any interesting values for LD_ASSUME_KERNEL - until the next ABI change it's probably useless) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
