On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 08:56:51PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Hello, > > Looks like this change was introduced with commit r4606 and not > documented nor propagated to all arch maintainers properly. > > Waldi: can you please elaborate? should we add > > kernel-header-dirs: <kernel arch name> > > to every debian/arch/$arch/defines file or are you working on an > alternative fix? > > > I think 2.6.14-2 should wait until this is fixed, otherwise the kernel > images will be useless for most users relying on external modules.
To all concerned, this was indeed fallout from some packaging changes. The missing line should now be in the tree for each architecture - though I had to do a bit of guess, so if you are an arch maintainer, please take a peek. The fix should appear in 2.6.14-2, and that should be released shortly. There seems to be an unrelated headers problem, #336424, which has been around since 2.6.12-X, but only noticed recently. I'd like to get that fixed, but it seems much less severe than this problem. http://bugs.debian.org/336424 -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
