On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:03:38PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Package: dput-ng > Version: 1.5 > Severity: minor > > Hi folks,
Howdy Russ, always a pleasure to find bugs from you :) > > dput-ng seems a little chattier than I would prefer, particularly when > a post_upload_comamnd fails. Here's a transcript of a recent run. > Things of note there: > > 1. The running lines were kind of interesting the first time I used it > after upgrading, but are getting kind of tiresome now. I'm not sure > it's really important for me to know that dput is doing that every > time I run it. A good point. Perhaps we can drop the verbosity on that. > 2. When a post_upload_command fails, I expect to see the output from > that command (that's all the reprepro output here). It's also nice > to have the command that ran and the exit status. But I'm not sure > I really care about Python barfing out its backtrace, and in this > particular case, since it came before the actual error output, it > obscured the actual problem. ACK. I do agree as well. > Also, as a much more minor note, dput-ng seems quite fond of long (>80 > column) lines, which makes some of its informational output a bit hard > to read. This is probably a personal preference thing, but in case no > one else has given the feedback, I personally would rather the first line > be something more like: > > Uploading stanford-server using scp to local > Host: genesis.stanford.edu > Directory: /srv/repos/local/incoming > > or maybe: > > Uploading stanford-server using scp to local > (genesis.stanford.edu:/srv/repos/local/incoming) No objections here! Thanks for the report, Russ, I'll get right on it. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
