On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:12 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > Ah... I wasn't aware that upstream still actively discourages it's > > use :) > I don't discourage it's use, but I don't really want to encourage it yet > either. > There is certainly useful functionality, but it lacks polish. I see... well I guess it's up to Martin/Michael then to include it or not. But when considering that it's a read-only process (AFAIU) anyway... inclusion shouldn't harm too much, I guess.
> I don't object to carrying a FAQ in the mdadm package. It might even be > quite useful. Martin, Michael? > Getting udev rules right is a bit of pain. > I think of the ones I package with mdadm as more of a suggestion than a > requirement. I'm open to fixes, and to distro-specific rules files, if > anyone wants to send me some. Well I guess I'll have to leave this open to Martin/Michael largely, since I have no ideas of their intentions behind the differences :) Thanks, Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
