Hi Francesco,
the bug is still opened. I am working on it, but I need more time. I
uploaded 8 patches to upstream and I created a new package version
today, because the package had problems to build in PowerPC architecture.
About the fixed-upstream, see these lines:
*Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.* Request was from
|bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org| to
|cont...@bugs.debian.org|. (Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:46:41 GMT) Full text
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=46;bug=705688> and
rfc822 format
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=46;mbox=yes;bug=705688> available.
That tag was added by a robot. The robot see that the bug was closed in
upstream, so it thinks that the bug was solved. The robot is new, and it
has some issues yet. It doesn't matters, I am working on your bug :-)
Currently, I am thinking how to call the s2ram code from s2both to avoid
this problem, or at least test this case.
Cheers,
Rodolfo.
--
||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia
||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/
