Am 28.06.2013 23:03, schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer: > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 21:57 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: >> I don't get it. Do you even check the things you claim before sending >> bugreports? > Sure ;-)
Good :) >> Defaults for plain dm-crypt devices didn't change within the >> last releases. > Yeah I saw that... but the reason for that, as Milan laid out is > backwards compatibility, right? > So that means we need to keep the "old" settings in cryptsetup (binary) > and in the scripts where you auto-set-up devices... > > But IMHO we could change any recipes (because for new setups,... nothing > should prevent people to use the "better" modes with plain). Agreed. > But all the above matches are, AFAICS, examples on how users could set > up their swap, etc. pp. right? > > If you agree that we can/should change these... I can make a patch. Ok, indeed the examples could be changed to use xts. Feel free to provide a patch. I'll happily accept it. As long as only the values for block cipher mode etc. are changed, and you don't change other details here and there ;) Kind regards, jonas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
