On mer., 2013-06-26 at 00:41 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On mar., 2013-06-25 at 23:22 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > As we already pushed new upstream releases to > > > > Squeeze, it might make sense to keep going that way (I have a bit of > > > > fear that every webapp ends up like that but eh). > > > > > > I suppose the leap between 3.3 and 3.5 would be too high, but I don't > > > really care about Wordpress. > > > > Actually we went from 3.0 to 3.3 in Squeeze for the same reasons. > > Raphael, what is your opinion on this? > > I'm not opposed to uploading 3.5 to Squeeze, but you took care of that in > the past, do you feel like doing it again? > > Because I can't really test wordpress in oldstable. My own server is > running wheezy (and is running the unstable package already).
I'm currently running the unstable package on a mixed squeeze/wheezy install and it seems to work just fine. I think it should be ok here. I'll prepare an upload and a DSA text indicating that it's not possible to backport individual security patches so we do the full new version. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
