On 06/19/2013 08:32 PM, David Bateman wrote:
On 06/20/2013 01:10 AM, David Bateman wrote:
I'd like to add some tests first and see if any other bugs have turned
up after this change. For example the changes use made to sprand and
sprandn 2 years ago to call randperm also overflows. At the moment I'm
getting 791 failed tests with "make check" is that normal ? David
Ok, it seems Jaroslav's code for idx_vector(Sparse<bool> hasn't been
used much in the last 5 years as it was completely wrong and when I
started using it, it caused 791 failures in "make check". I've fixed his
code as it makes sense to use it and pushed my changeset at
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/8fce0ed4894a
This change seems OK to me, but is there some reason to not use
dim_vector dv = dims ();
return (dv.any_zero ());
as the default definition for is_empty?
jwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
