On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:58:09 -0700, tony mancill wrote:

> > Ack; thanks for the report, and I'll either add some more versions or
> > try to find a better solution ... 
> Just to so we don't duplicate efforts, I'm working on an update now.  

Cool, then I stop my just starting "efforts" right now :)

> I
> checked several of the r-deps of xulrunner and others appear to be doing
> the same thing we do in tuxguitar - i.e. listing out the possibilities
> all ORed together.

I thought about using dh_xulrunner (doesn't work since it looks for
iceweasel plugins) or other forms of creating the dependency
dynamically (just taking the current version of xulrunner-dev etc.)
-- but this doesn't buy us binNMU-ability since the package is still
arch:all ...
So I think we're stuck with listing the versions ...

Something like a versionless xulrunner package would be nice; I'm
vaguely remembering a wishlist bug about this but can't find it now.

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Andrew Lloyd Webber & Tim Rice

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to