Ne 16. červen 2013, 02:46:08 CEST
Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> napsal:

> I fail to see how the relevancy of such fix for Wheezy.  Yes, I do
> see the relevancy for a backporting by a strict rule only allowing to 
> contaminate the final system, not contaminate the build-environment
> with other backported build-dependencies - but such stric rule is
> then evidently not helping you in situations like this.  So relax
> that rule and backport CDBS - should be seemlessly backportable even
> to oldstable.

Hi Jonas,
thanks for quick reply. 

I actually use the (privately) backported version, but I thought if the
fix will go to stable, version uploaded to backports will complicate
things.

Thanks for clarification, I will push the backport to wheezy-backports.
Note I am not the DD nor DM, and I do not use cdbs much, but I will try
to track changes and update backports as needed.

Cheers, Petr


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to