> Why is this needed instead of using adt-run from autopkgtest? sadt is a trivial tool to do what should be a nice easy task; autopkgtest seems to be shrouded in complexity which means that, like piuparts, developers just don't bother with it. sadt also runs quite happily as an unprivileged user which seems much more sensible for running tests of code that is designed to run as an unprivileged user (i.e. most code in the archive); autopkgtest still does not support that (#648148).
just my 0.02ยข -- Stuart Prescott http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org GPG fingerprint BE65 FD1E F4EA 08F3 23D4 3C6D 9FE8 B8CD 71C5 D1A8 GPG fingerprint 90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
