Michael Stapelberg wrote: > AFAICT, there are no such binaries shipped with debhelper itself. Does > that imply that we should ship such a tool in e.g. systemd-dev built > from the systemd source package? Is that what you’re suggesting?
You could put the tool into dpkg-dev, or something. I suppose adding a build dep on some other package like systemd-dev would not be a large problem for packages that actually contain systemd services. There should be only on the order of hundreds of them, right? > > Oh yeah, something else I don't like doing in debhelper is encoding the > > current location in PATH of commands. Similar autoscripts use which > This sentence looks cut-off. Could you clarify what you meant? I mean, use `which command` to test if the command exists somewhere in PATH. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
