> An alternative would be for someone else to package the new version as
> rng-tools4, or just submit a patch adding RDRAND support to the
> unofficial fork.  I didn't accept the TPM patches because it would
> clash with the kernel and the rest of the userspace TPM stack, but
> RDRAND is different.

I backported RDRAND support to the unofficial fork.  Could you please review:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/rng-tools

https://github.com/cernekee/rng-tools/commits/master
aka: git clone git://github.com/cernekee/rng-tools

I created an "upstream/2-unofficial-mt.15" release on the upstream
branch, then merged it to master and added the debian/ changes on top.

Tested with:

Debian sid
Ubuntu Precise and Quantal
RDRAND (Ivy Bridge Core i5)
No RNG case (VirtualBox)
No AES-NI case (fall back to libgcrypt)
gcc -m32
rngd -r /dev/urandom
lintian -IE --pedantic

Not tested with an actual non-RDRAND HW RNG. :(

rngtest FIPS pass/fail results were indistinguishable from those of
the upstream rng-tools 4.  Also, the performance variations between
AES-NI and libgcrypt mirrored the rng-tools 4 results.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to