Hi, On Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > So we need define what we consider "pedantic" errors.
yes, but let's start as we have piuparts.d.o now: without pedantic tests. So
that at first the PTS will only display really bad stuff and people will get
trained to follow these links.
> Maybe a format of
[...]
> but it wouldn't need to be used from the beginning, we could just
> hardcode fail to serious and have it in the status file (until we decide
> at some point that some issues may get less attention)
sounds good.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
