Hi Christopher,
On Do, 30 Mai 2013, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Have the maintainers of texinfo at least considered analyzing the
> impact of this decision and started a Mass-Bug-Filling? I'm really
> bothered by having tens of unreported RC bugs sitting somewhere
Links please? I tried to search the bug database using
http://bugs-search.debian.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi
which ended in an Internal Server Error ...
> Additionally some information on how to fix problems due to the texinfo
> change e.g. at [0] would be highly appreciated. I'm looking specifically
> at #708460 and related issues [1].
I have added a paragraph to the Wiki FTBFS page concerning the
@itemx
problem.
Sample patch:
@@ -1001,20 +1001,20 @@
...
@end example
-@itemx --skip-lily-check
+@item --skip-lily-check
Do not fail if no lilypond output is found. It is used for LilyPond
Info documentation without images.
-@itemx --skip-png-check
+@item --skip-png-check
Do not fail if no PNG images are found for EPS files. It is used for
LilyPond Info documentation without images.
....
The texinfo manual, ch 11.4.3, states:
Use '@item' for the first entry, and '@itemx' for all subsequent
entries; '@itemx' must always follow an '@item' command, with no blank
line intervening.
Concerning the other item, please send me the problematic
texinfo code (minimal example if possible).
Thanks
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
