Source: libarchive
Version: 3.1.2-7
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

The latest builds of libarchive on mips and powerpc failed with errors
from test_read_disk_directory_traversals, which reported atime mismatches:

115: test_read_disk_directory_traversals
libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1160: File at has atime 
1369518519.000000000, expected 3808012493914112.1159668743880045816
   Description: Atime should be restored
libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1162: File at/f1 has 
atime 1369518519.000000000, expected 3807918004633600.1159668743880045816
   Description: Atime should be restored
libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1164: File at/f2 has 
atime 1369518519.000000000, expected 3807965249273856.1159668743880045816
   Description: Atime should be restored
libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1209: File at has atime 
1369518519.000000000, expected 3808012493914112.1159668743880045816
   Description: Atime should be restored
libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1263: File at has atime 
1369518519.000000000, expected 3808012493914112.1159668743880045816
   Description: Atime should be restored

(The absurdly high "expected" values apparently stem from a reporting
error that could stand fixing as well, though I won't bother filing a
separate bug report: assertion_file_time in libarchive/test/main.c
uses %lld for t and nsec even though they have type long, not long
long.)

Could you please take a look?

Thanks!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to