Il 25/05/2013 23:36, Jakub Wilk ha scritto: > * Giulio Paci <giuliop...@gmail.com>, 2013-05-11, 17:04: >> git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/opengrm-ngram.git > > FWIW, packages are only required to be buildable on architectures for which > they have previously built successfully. So #707826 doesn't need to be > serious; it could be > important. (But of course, as a maintainer, you can keep the severity as > serious if you wish so.)
I do not remember where I got the idea to set severity as serious for this bug. But I remember me reading something that convinced me it was serious. > Do you know what it FTBFS on amd64? Last time I checked amd64 was > little-endian, so #707826 can't be the reason. ;) The problem is not the same, but the fix is. According to upstream the amd64 architecture is failing to pass the tests because the failing test script is not robust enough and sometime it fails. I also have to add that I have compiled opengrm-ngram many times on amd64 architecture (personally I need this package only for amd64 architecture... Murphy's law? :-) ) and never failed to build/pass the tests... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
