On Saturday, May 25, 2013 11:31:42 PM Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:06:43 Luke-Jr wrote: > > Could you make your draft packaging available so I can experiment some > > more on my end in the meantime? > > Draft packaging is committed to > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bitcoin/bfgminer.git
- There should be no build-depends for OpenCL: BFGMiner includes the official headers from Khronos, and uses dlopen to avoid any link-time library dependency. - The ADL SDK (commented in rules) is not needed or used at all for BFGMiner; instead, it includes minimal statement-of-fact headers (at least in the US jurisdiction, not eligible for copyright) I wrote to replace the non-free dependency. As the ADL library itself (linked with dlopen) is part of the OS when available, it should fall within the GPL's exception for that. - I am aware of the Ztex copyright issue, have been working to resolve it, and expect to have it resolved prior to the next release (soon). Currently, this is waiting only on a license grant from one minor contributor (the original author and other contributors to the code in question are agreeable with GPL-3+ terms). - Not familiar with what "libudev-dev [!kfreebsd-any]" does; does it block packaging on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD? Ideally non-Linux platforms would simply build without libudev, since it is optional. In fact, on systems with sysfs, I don't believe there is any benefit to building with libudev at all anymore - so perhaps it should just be disabled? Luke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
