Package: libc6 Version: 2.17-3 Severity: important Version 2.17-3 of libc6 in testing is significantly slower than version 2.13-38 in stable. Installing only the updated libc6 and dependent packages causes a slowdown of up to 50% in parts of a benchmark test.
The tests below were run on a VirtualBox client Debian Gnu/Linux i386 installation of testing before and after upgrading libc6. The exact list of changed packages is the following: -ii libc-dev-bin 2.13-38 i386 Embedded GNU C Library: Development binaries -ii libc6:i386 2.13-38 i386 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries -ii libc6-dev:i386 2.13-38 i386 Embedded GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files -ii libc6-i686:i386 2.13-38 i386 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized] -ii locales 2.13-38 all Embedded GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [support] +ii libc-dev-bin 2.17-3 i386 Embedded GNU C Library: Development binaries +ii libc6:i386 2.17-3 i386 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries +ii libc6-dev:i386 2.17-3 i386 Embedded GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files +ii libc6-i686:i386 2.17-3 i386 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized] +ii locales 2.17-3 all Embedded GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [support] The test program was nbench2: http://www.tux.org/~mayer/linux/nbench-byte-2.2.3.tar.gz The only modification to the program was make the compiled executable dynamically linked instead of statically linked: --- Makefile~ 2004-12-30 02:23:30.000000000 +0000 +++ Makefile 2013-05-25 08:33:44.841319746 +0100 @@ -25 +25 @@ -CFLAGS = -s -static -Wall -O3 +CFLAGS = -s -Wall -O3 The results with libc6 2.13-38 are: TEST : Iterations/sec. : --------------------:------------------: NUMERIC SORT : 1063.5 : STRING SORT : 578.16 : BITFIELD : 5.1673e+08 : FP EMULATION : 183.46 : FOURIER : 28943 : ASSIGNMENT : 40.862 : IDEA : 7928 : HUFFMAN : 3732.5 : NEURAL NET : 49.96 : LU DECOMPOSITION : 1723 : ==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS========================== INTEGER INDEX : 101.010 FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 61.778 ==============================LINUX DATA BELOW=============================== CPU : GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3110M CPU @ 2.40GHz 0MHz L2 Cache : 6144 KB OS : Linux 3.9.0-1 C compiler : gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5) libc : MEMORY INDEX : 31.023 INTEGER INDEX : 21.571 FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 34.264 The results with libc6 2.17-3 (not re-compiled) are: TEST : Iterations/sec. : --------------------:------------------:- NUMERIC SORT : 1092.6 : STRING SORT : 602.64 : BITFIELD : 5.1374e+08 : FP EMULATION : 166.96 : FOURIER : 12296 : ASSIGNMENT : 38.235 : IDEA : 7868 : HUFFMAN : 3462.4 : NEURAL NET : 51.758 : LU DECOMPOSITION : 2237 : ==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS========================== INTEGER INDEX : 98.435 FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 51.265 ==============================LINUX DATA BELOW=============================== CPU : GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3110M CPU @ 2.40GHz 2396MHz L2 Cache : 6144 KB OS : Linux 3.9.0-1 C compiler : gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5) libc : MEMORY INDEX : 30.706 INTEGER INDEX : 20.777 FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 28.434 The overall benchmark is 5%-10% slower but the FOURIER sub-test only achieves half the rate. Recompiling on the system with the new libc6 produces similar results, in particular the FOURIER sub-test is still half the rate. When testing one of my own programs I see a slowdown of between 30% and 100%. -- Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org