Hi, Since my debiandoc-sgml depends on this package and this has been orphaned, I decided to take over and updated package in modern style.
As for this bug, http://bugs.debian.org/305736 in message #20: ---------------- Michael Smith <sm...@xml-doc.org> writes: > I guess it doesn't hurt, as long as the filenames of the *.ent > files are consistent between the dbcentx.mod file and the filenames > in /usr/share/xml/entities/xml-iso-entities-8879.1986/ [...] > So I think maybe sgml-data needs to be updated so that > /usr/share/xml/entities/xml-iso-entities-8879.1986/ includes the > filenames like "isoamsa.ent". They can just be made symlinks to, > e.g., "ISOamsa.ent". I agree. I'll redirect this bug to sgml-data. I wonder why I was using the upper cased versions in the first place. ---------------- As I see the content of the catalog/catalog.xml file in xml side, <!-- derived from V0.3, see http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/docbook/xmlcharent/ Note: file names changed to comply with LSB SGML/XML Recommendations, R006 So this seems to have some reason and the above link is dead link. Can anyone elucidate me. There are only 2 bugs on this package and both seems to be the same issue. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
