Package: aplus-fsf-dev Version: 4.22.1-6 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The package aplus-fsf-dev does not contain header files required to compile user-written C subroutines to be called from A+.
These files are not currently packaged at all. Currently aplus-fsf-dev is an empty metapackage that depends on other aplus-fsf* packages while the name misleadingly suggests that it should contain development headers. Moreover, descriptions of aplus-fsf and aplus-fsf-doc state that aplus-fsf-dev contains the "development environment" as opposed to the "run-time environment" provided by aplus-fsf binary package which reinforces that expectation. I suggest renaming aplus-fsf which contains the interpreter and it's core libraries to something else (like aplus-fsf-core), using the name aplus-fsf for a metapackage depending on all the other packages, and providing development files in aplus-fsf-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages aplus-fsf-dev depends on: ii aplus-fsf 4.22.1-6 ii aplus-fsf-doc 4.22.1-6 ii aplus-fsf-el 4.22.1-6 Versions of packages aplus-fsf-dev recommends: ii xfonts-kapl 4.22.1-6 aplus-fsf-dev suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
