Hi, On 07/01/13 16:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
> This missing "+" in the regex has been fixed in Lintian 2.5.11 > (experimental)[1]; though my question remains if we should really > re-order those regexes. I believe you are right. The idea is to find a link with either of the two formats: libwhatever.so -> libwhatever-X.so libwhatever.so -> libwhatever.so.X So the two regexes really should be mutually exclusive. However, our package (libevent) actually does the following: libevent.so -> libevent-2.0.so.2.0.21 My question is: is this worth inclusion in lintian as an acceptable format, or should I just add an override and be done with it? FWIW, after a cursory look at the list of tagged packages, there are at least a couple of other libs using the same format (libdirectfb, libnet6, probably others). Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
