On 05/17/2013 08:22 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting "Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]>: >> Package: trac-accountmanager > ... >> Since the package has been removed from the PAPT repository, please >> remove >> PAPT as maintainer. > > OK, will do. > The same would apply to trac, right? > Daniel (dkg) moved the latest version to collab-maint git. > And python-pyscss ("my" package).
I would be quite happy to have all these packages stay under PAPT, but i
find i am much more effective at contributing to packaging that uses a
distributed revision control system.
I would be fine moving these packages to a python-apps git repo instead
of collab-maint if people on PAPT prefer that particular location.
Given how straightforward it is to join collab-maint, i also don't have
a problem with leaving PAPT-maintained packages within the collab-maint
umbrella either.
If there is a strong preference from PAPT folks about where
PAPT-maintained git repositories should end up, i haven't heard it, and
i've been trying to follow the mailing list. Is this discussion
happening somewhere else that i should be aware of?
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
