* Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> wrote: > * Jon Bernard <jbern...@debian.org>, 2012-09-14, 08:42: > >>liblttng-ust-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the > >>following file is architecture-dependent: > >> > >>/usr/include/lttng/ust-config.h > >> > >>An example diff between i386 and armel is attached. > > > >Thanks for catching this. I understand the problem, but I'm > >failing to grasp the solution. Can you elaborate a bit more? I > >agree that defining HAVE_EFFICIENT_...is a good thing for > >architectures that support it, but this patch would be global to > >all builds, no? > > I think there's been a misunderstanding here. The file I attached is > not a patch. It's merely an illustration of the problem.
I don't completely follow what you're saying, can you provide additional clarification? From what I've read, "Multi-Arch: same" says the package must not be used to satisfy the dependency of any package of a different architecture from itself - isn't this the desired outcome? -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
