Loic Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > That looks a lot better. There's one more thing, though, you'll have to
> > do before you can upload: bump up the version number since you had already
> > uploaded the other package with the large diff. After that, it should be
> > fine. (the urgency should be at least medium, though, but that's not that
> > important).
>
> When I uploaded it, that was with a .2 NMU number (ie. I bumped the
> version). The urgency was low though, but you said that's not as
> important.
>
> I don't see buildd logs for this version though.
Indeed, they're missing. Your source package is in the archive, though,
and looks good.
Regards,
Joey
--
Still can't talk about what I can't talk about. Sorry. -- Bruce Schneier
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
