Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:11:20PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
>> Justin B Rye wrote:
>>> Christian PERRIER wrote:
>>>> Default: http://yourserver/tt-rss/
>>>
>>> It seems to me we should have some explicit policy rule against
>>> defaults like this: http://[CENSORED].com really exists. If you need
>>> a dummy hostname that's guaranteed not to have a webserver, what's
>>> wrong with example.org? Or we could even make the default localhost,
>>> so that it'll work for testing before you set it live. But none of
>>> this is in my patch.
>>
>> Indeed, while it reached d-l-e as
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2013/05/msg00040.html
>> just mentioning yourserver dot com seems to have got my mail
>> rejected by the BTS spam-filters, so probably we ought to fix it.
>
> I used "http://yourserver/tt-rss/"; as default, since it is the
> default from upstream's example config. This default value gets
> special handling in upstream's sourcecode (it will show a page,
> that the config value must be changed).
Upstream bugs are still bugs! Let them know that if they want a safe
example domain they should be following RFC2606. But until then it's
up to you whether you want to stick to their default.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
