Package: acl Version: 2.2.51-8 Severity: important Dear Maintainer,
What led up to the situation? Creating a subdirectory would not inherit the proper permissions defined in setfacl. What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Created users user1,user2 and added user2 to group user1 Created a directory: sudo mkdir /srv/test sudo chown user1:user1 /srv/test/ sudo chmod 770 /srv/test/ sudo setfacl -d -m m:rwx /srv/test/ sudo setfacl -m m:rwx /srv/test/ $ sudo getfacl test # file: test # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rwx group::rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::rwx default:mask::rwx default:other::--- Created a subdirectory: as user2: mkdir /srv/test/newdir What was the outcome of this action? $ls -la test/ | grep newdir drwxr-x---+ 3 user2 user2 4096 May 12 13:11 newdir $ sudo getfacl test/newdir # file: test/newdir # owner: user2 # group: user2 user::rwx group::rwx #effective:r-x mask::r-x other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::rwx default:mask::rwx default:other::--- What outcome did you expect instead? The new subdirectory group permissions should be rwx and not r-x -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages acl depends on: ii libacl1 2.2.51-8 ii libattr1 1:2.4.46-8 ii libc6 2.13-38 acl recommends no packages. acl suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
