Le Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:23:21PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > [...] > > @@ -4716,7 +4716,7 @@ fi > > dependencies on other packages, the package names listed may > > also include lists of alternative package names, separated > > by vertical bar (pipe) symbols <tt>|</tt>. In such a case, > > - if any one of the alternative packages is installed, that > > + if any one of the alternative packages is "Installed", that > > part of the dependency is considered to be satisfied. > > I'm a bit nervous about this change, since dependencies are more > complicated than that. For example, a Depends relation does not > prevent a package being on the system while packages it depends on are > missing, especially during an upgrades. > > There is another use of installed with the same meaning nearby, which > this patch doesn't touch: > > Packages can declare in their control file that they have > certain relationships to other packages - for example, that > they may not be installed at the same time as certain other > packages, and/or that they depend on the presence of others. > > How about something like: > > In such a case, > that part of the dependency can be satisfied by any one of > the alternative packages.
Hi Jonathan, it is even better, thanks ! I have pushed the changes with your correction. Have a nice week-end, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org