Hi Jonathan, On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for writing. It does seem low-risk. Can you say a little more > about your workflow? Do you work on a wheezy system or squeeze + > squeeze-backports? Would you be willing to use a package from > wheezy-backports if available? Where do GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE get > set: are they part of scripts that you use, something you set by hand, > or set some other way?
We are using a wheezy system. In fact we have already applied the patch I mentioned to fix our service but an upstream package is always more suitable. A wheezy-backports would be a possible solution if available but since the fix seems to me low-risk as well I thought it could be a nice solution to propose the fix as a wheezy update. GIT_WORK_TREE and GIT_DIR are indeed set by our script (env variable) but you have default values as well. Thanks, -- William -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
