On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:33:23AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If I simply change (in > > linuxthreads/sysdep/unix/sysv/linux/not-cancel.h) from: > > > > # define waitpid_not_cancel(pid, stat_loc, options) \ > > INLINE_SYSCALL (osf_wait4, 4, pid, stat_loc, options, NULL) > > > > to: > > > > # define waitpid_not_cancel(pid, stat_loc, options) \ > > wait4( pid, stat_loc, options, NULL ) > > > > all is well > > That's weird. What happens with -O0? What with gcc 3.3? Can you > perhaps attach the assembly that is generated for the "broken" case?
Oho: take a look at alpha/wait4.S. It looks like sys_wait4 is relatively new on Alpha. Anyone know how new? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
