Le samedi 04 mai 2013 à 15:24 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : > Sébastien Villemot <sebast...@debian.org> writes: > > Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on > > octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5. > > Is there any reason why octave has Priority: extra and not optional?
My impression is that octave better fits the definition of "extra" than "optional" given in policy §2.5. However, all the dependencies of octave are of priority "optional", so increasing the priority of octave would also solve the priority/dependency constraints (for the 8 binary packages generated from the octave source package). Since the latter solution means less work to both you and me, I am fine with it if it makes more sense to you. Thanks, -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part