On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 04:09:51AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
> Il 25/04/2013 08:42, Andreas Tille ha scritto:
> > The advantage of using Debian Science in your specific case would be
> > that there is some gatherer for machine readable information running on
> > this repository to fetch all metadata for the packaging and we could put
> > it on our tasks list for Debian Science packages[1] *right now* even
> > before it is uploaded to Debian. So you could on one hand use another
> > "channel" than ITP to show that there is some work in progress and on
> > the other hand you can "advertise" the program on the web sentinel pages
> > to the world (for instance including scientific publication data or
> > whatever).
>
> Is this possible only for packages under Debian Science? Or is it possible to
> have some of these features for other packages as well?
You can / should add a debian/upstream file to all your packages. The
Blends features can be used for all packages fitting in one of the
existing (or to be created) Blends. You should be a bit more specific
about your package in mind.
> > BTW, could you tell me in what tasks listed[1] the package would fit?
> > Inventing a new task would be fine as well.
>
> I think "Linguistics" is ok for this package.
> "Phonetics", "Speech processing" or "Natural Language Processing" would also
> be good tasks for this package.
OK, I have added sequitur-g2p that is now in new queue to linguistics.
It would be great if you would consider using a Debian Science VCS and
join the Debian Science list to bring in further input fot the other
suggested tasks. It would be good to have these but just featuring a
single package does not make much sense to me.
Kind regards and thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
