Petr,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:19:26AM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
[...]
> *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
> * What led up to the situation?
> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
> * What was the outcome of this action?
> * What outcome did you expect instead?
>
> *** End of the template - remove these lines ***
(As a side note, I'm not very enthusiast with such templates. I found
that very unfriendly)
About wkhtmltopdf, like you I will be glad to upload a new release but
as I previously said there is *no new upstream release* other than the
one already present in unstable.
There was a 0.10 branch without a final release. Now there is a 0.11
branch but I don't know if it will be same.
The major changes with wkhtmltopdf >= 0.10 is that the main binary was
split in binaries + libraries, it means that it needs some extra work.
I've started to package the wkhtmltopdf 0.11-rc1, it's far from being
finished. It's not possible to upload it as it is, it needs some
patching (again, because it's a *development release*).
Raphaël already suggested to upload it to experimental, but I don't want
to upload such package with very new/unstable ABI and update it
regularly to follow the development changes.
IMO, it's not suitable yet for Debian (even for experimental).
However, I will contact the upstream developer and ask him if there is a
roadmap for the next stable release.
I suggest you to do the same, tell the upstream your interest in a new
stable release. It will help to get it in Debian as soon as it will be
released.
M.
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
mail: kolter@{openics,debian}.org gpg: 4096R/0x929D42C3
xmpp: [email protected] irc: kolter@{freenode,oftc}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
