* Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> [28-04-2013 10:10 EEST]: > 28.04.2013 01:39, Edward J. Shornock wrote: > > Package: qemu-user-static > > Version: 1.4.0+dfsg-2exp > > Severity: normal > >
> Um-oh. So almost every command will abort. How very nice.
Yes. `pwd` works. bash works. dash works. Most other things I've tried
fail.
In case it's of use:
# chroot debian-powerpc/
I have no name!@darkside:/# cd
I have no name!@darkside:~# cd /
I have no name!@darkside:/# cd /mnt
I have no name!@darkside:/mnt# bash
I have no name!@darkside:/mnt# dash
# (at this point I pressed CTRL+D)
qemu-ppc-static: /tmp/buildd/qemu-1.1.2+dfsg/linux-user/signal.c:4341:
setup_frame: Assertion `({ unsigned long __guest = (unsigned
long)(ka->_sa_handler) - guest_base; (__guest < (1ul << 32)) && (!reserved_va
|| (__guest < reserved_va)); })' failed.
Aborted
qemu-ppc-static: /tmp/buildd/qemu-1.1.2+dfsg/linux-user/signal.c:4341:
setup_frame: Assertion `({ unsigned long __guest = (unsigned
long)(ka->_sa_handler) - guest_base; (__guest < (1ul << 32)) && (!reserved_va
|| (__guest < reserved_va)); })' failed.
Aborted
> Later on you wrote:
>
> > I am able to create the powerpc chroot on Pentium III system using the
> > steps outlined in the initial post.
>
> So that appears to be 32/64bit conversion somewhere. PIII is 32bits,
> and your original system is 64bit. That should be enough to reproduce.
Indeed. Since that launchpad thread hinted at it being a 64-bit issue I
wanted to "brush the dust off" of the PIII to test the theory. Since
that 2nd post of mine (RE: success on the PIII) I've done a bit more
testing and everything--so far--has worked on the 32bit system, though
I've not tried compiling anything yet.
At least at this point it appears to be a 64 VS 32 bit issue.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
