tags 335479 + patch thanks Hi Thomas,
Thomas Schoepf wrote: > Hello Wolfgang, > > >>OK is it correctly configured and do you have java-gcj-compat-dev >>installed and configured (its the one providing rmic) ? > > > No, java-gcj-compat-dev is not installed. There are no depend, recommend or > suggest headers with java-gcj-compat. Thats right. java-gcj-compat is the JRE and java-gcj-compat is the JDK like java environment. There is no point to suggest or recommend a JDK if one installs a JRE. > Why is java-gcj-compat registering an alternative for a file that it does > not contain? That's how I understand the problem at the moment. Well, package structure changes and mistakes happens. But know I found the problem ... GCC-Maintainers: The postinst registers rmic instead of rmiregistry and the prerm does not deregister gcj-dbtool - Patches (against 1.0.41-2) attached. Wolfgang
--- debian/java-gcj-compat.postinst.orig 2005-10-25 13:54:12.000000000 +0000 +++ debian/java-gcj-compat.postinst 2005-10-25 13:56:35.000000000 +0000 @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ } jdk_alternative jar -jdk_alternative rmic jdk_alternative java +jdk_alternative rmiregistry jdk_alternative gcj-dbtool #DEBHELPER#
--- debian/java-gcj-compat.prerm.orig 2005-10-25 13:57:04.000000000 +0000 +++ debian/java-gcj-compat.prerm 2005-10-25 13:57:23.000000000 +0000 @@ -12,5 +12,6 @@ jdk_alternative jar jdk_alternative java jdk_alternative rmiregistry +jdk_alternative gcj-dbtool #DEBHELPER#
