(Falk, please tell us if you don't want to be CC'ed to further answers) Quoting Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:39:26AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Quoting Falk Hueffner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > > This breaks building geneweb and probably a whole bunch of other > > > > Which could be ween as "breaks unrelated software" by the way. > > > > I'm not fond of overflated severities but, well, my pet package > > (geneweb) is actually blocked by this....so I really hope that someone > > will be able to take care of this. > > Christian, can you rebuild geneweb using bytecode on alpha, and downgrade this > bug to important ?
The bug actually *is* important and I do not really intent to make it "serious". I'm not sure about the right way to recompile geneweb with bytecode on alpha. Actually, this is done in debian/rules with: PACKAGE=geneweb WAY=$(shell if [ -f "/usr/bin/ocamlc.opt" ]; then echo "opt"; \ else echo "out"; \ fi) Then $WAY is used to compile one way or another. I guess that adding a specific test for Alpha architecture here would be the Right Hack. Something like: DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH_OS) ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS),alpha) WAY=out else WAY=$(shell if [ -f "/usr/bin/ocamlc.opt" ]; then echo "opt"; \ else echo "out"; \ fi) endif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]